1. Whether Scott v. Harris permits courts to resolve qualified immunity at the pleading stage based on objective video evidence that demonstrates the implausibility of complaint allegations, even without "utterly discrediting" them?

2. Whether, upon proper consideration of video evidence under Scott v. Harris, clearly established law prohibited an officer's use of deadly force after losing control of his taser during a prolonged physical struggle with an actively resistant suspect who remained in close physical proximity to both the officer and the operable weapon?

Whether Scott v. Harris permits courts to resolve qualified immunity at the pleading stage based on objective video evidence that demonstrates the implausibility of complaint allegations, even without 'utterly discrediting' them?