Matthew Carter v. United States
fr) NMKkew CofVcr W<ed bu Ae-Udriue
EoUCS(5a' -> '
UXs McxW^ 'Cuo CmW U\ecyA\^ Sei-z^A as\d< seoccUeA oi\
V^ccejub-ex 31^ 2X>ZO <xac)< ^\aou\cL "tVvS s-ezxfcUe^
^eX<X h(xve b^A us^ cxgxs^f hVv\?
bAaW^eu) CcxfHrr faW V\im?
Hj b\A +Ue 'jWruVe. oV V^iWioas ofoeafo im <W
6x>w.CSe_ cocks kAcdfoeuJ ^2<xxMr |£qc\1Iw gi\Ioi/J£<A Ao
be pejemW -foe <x crW 6vec 10-V ye-rs old fo
V»W oa oV (JM. $
5j U3<xs NMMei/j Co/W pto^erk^ SeAAeNced. "foe
(Knav^ xjicKy, om cu;(d PiXAocjftxpUij M- of Ze>)8\
arA Ut (Tus^ce for \)icW /\cA- dr Zni<\'"^'a LmX }
soMe^ue RbfiAcuy or pw cU of 'Z6\o7
6-) Skofod ^udc^e foouer ScUrefor W\)«t fanned
lAottUuds foAeM foxfoM Cocpvii beiivq foe solmc
^p0Sea SerMAce un NMMeuJ
C^W y ^ofofooA oF So^ WoVa w
(SbCU cm\A A'i<X 4U\f ^re^tXUe AA^fUeu)?
Whether the sentencing of a defendant to over 10 years in prison based on a conviction from 2007 should be reviewed under current legal standards