No. 24-7527
Kh'Lajuwon Amari Murat v. United States
Tags: congressional-intent judicial-construction plain-meaning revocation statutory-interpretation supervised-release
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether, when a district court revokes a term of supervised release and imposes a period of imprisonment followed by a new term of supervised release, the original term of supervised release survives its revocation, contrary to the plain meaning of "revoke" as used in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether, when a district court revokes a term of supervised release and imposes a period of imprisonment followed by a new term of supervised release, the original term of supervised release survives its revocation, contrary to the plain meaning of 'revoke' as used in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3)
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-14
Waiver of United States of America of right to respond submitted.
2025-07-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2025-06-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 30, 2025)
Attorneys
Kh'Lajuwon Murat
Anshu Suresh Budhrani — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Moez Mansoor Kaba — Hueston Hennigan LLP, Respondent