No. 24-7512
Relisted (3)IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-suppression miranda-rights unlawful-arrest
Latest Conference:
2025-10-17
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Florida Supreme Court err in denying the respondent's motion to suppress evidence due to an unlawful arrest and Miranda rights violation?
Docket Entries
2025-10-20
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2025-10-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/17/2025.
2025-10-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.
2025-09-29
Rescheduled.
2025-07-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-04-15
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
Drummond, In Re Walter
Walter Drummond — Petitioner