I. Given the increasing ease of creating of artificial images, is the government required to present evidence that the images it contends are of minors represent actual persons?

II. Where evidence was presented that Mr. Schram admitted administering websites for the presentation of child pornography, was he unduly prejudiced when the government presented evidence of multiple highly offensive pornographic images, including uncharged misconduct evidence not linked to the websites?

Whether the government must prove images of child pornography depict actual minors and whether the introduction of uncharged pornographic images unduly prejudiced the defendant