1. Should the respondents in the above civil action
be allowed to Escape justice when part of the respond
ents namely the City of Philadelphia, PA have been
convicted of the bombing the residents of Osage Ave.
along with burning down said property, business along
with personal property as well as murdering five
babies?

2. Should the petitioner be put out of federal court
and told to litigate these issues in state court?

3. Should the respondents be allowed to steal
monies or abuse and / or misuse monies that the federal
government gave to the City of Philadelphia, PA to
compensate plaintiff and the other residents of Osage
Ave.?

4. Should this amended complaint under Federals
of Civil Procedures Rule 15 (b) be allowed to be heard
on the merits of truth, and deprives us of our civil
liberty and rights, where the respondents violated the
5th and 14th Amendments of the Constitution of the
United States of America and these government
officials must pay the plaintiff for the damage of
property under this law; and where these government
employees all took the swear by oath or / pledged to
the Constitution duties of this country must be held to
the strict standard of law under section (3) of the 14th
Amendment. Was the Petitioner and community were
never given a fair treatment of the law by these higher
appellate courts, or time bar us out in the cold with
our rights to these serious facts and is a serious error
by the court, and a Conflict of Law. "?

5. Should this court allow petitioner who is sui
juris to be stripped from her rights because of the 3,

11
compromise that in this constitution illegally that 's
denial or 14th and 5th Amendment of the United
States Constitutional Law, of the Due Process Clause,
which prohibits arbitrary deprivation of "life, liberty,
or property* by the government except as authorized
by law; and when the U.S. the Supreme Court has
interpreted these clauses broadly prior to 2022,
concluding that they provide three protection:
procedural due process (in civil and criminal proceed
ings:) substantive due process, a prohibition against
vague laws; and as the vehicle for the incorporation of
the Bill of Rights?

6. Should the petitioner who is sui juris and
family, friends, and the community of Osage Ave.
suffer by the hands of evil of government officials for
40 years and the torturing by said defendants in the
above caption of allowing to escape Equitable Relief,
Physiological Damage, Mental Scars, Livelihood,
and Sentimental Value etc. and the continuum of
egregious malice by the court and the above caption
violates the "Equal Protection " clause under the 14th
Amendment?

7. Should the question of redressing the nature
of the bombing and materials used by United States
Government agencies respondents Attorney General
Office, FBI, State Officials, and E&I Dupont should be
held accountable under the civil rights violation of the
rule of law?

8. Should the U.S. Gov. Agencies be allowed to
escape murder, whereas pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C.
section 1391(e)

Whether government officials can be held liable for damages resulting from the bombing of Osage Avenue and violation of civil rights