WHETHER THE LOWER COURTS ERRED IN ADJUDICATING
CLAIMS IN HABEAS CORPUS PETITIONS TO DETERMINE
A VIOLATION OF THGE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
WHEN THERE IS NO CLEARLY ESTABLISHED LAW RELATING
TO CIVIL MANAGEMENT PROCEEDINGS

WHETHER THE LOWER COURTS DEPARTED FROM THE
ACCEPTED AND USUAL COURSE OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
TO REVIEW DISPOSITIVE MATTERS DE NOVO, THAT
AMOUNT TO A VIOLATION OF THE MAGISTRATE ACT,
HABEAS RUEEH8(b), ARTICLE III, AND THE DUE PROCESS
CLAUSE OF THE FIFTH AMEND. TO UNITED STATES
CONSTITUTION

Whether the lower courts erred in adjudicating habeas corpus petitions without clearly established law and in departing from standard judicial review procedures