Did the trial court exceed its jurisdiction in violation of the Fifth Amendment's Double Jeopardy Clause by trying Mr. Dizzley a second time for the crime of murder and imposing a sentence on him after discharging his jury in his first trial on the grounds that the prosecution failed to meet the "burden of proof" to convict him?

Can The United States Supreme Court use its discretionary powers as leverage simply choosing not to adjudicate a case pursuant to an illegal incarceration and strictly apply Supreme Court procedural rules to turn a "blind eye" to condone, and to authorize the continued unlawful imprisonment of an American citizen, in violation of his Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendment rights?

Did the trial court exceed its jurisdiction in violation of the Fifth Amendment's Double Jeopardy Clause by trying Mr. Dizzley a second time for the crime of murder and imposing a sentence on him after discharging his jury in his first trial on the grounds that the prosecution failed to meet the 'burden of proof' to convict him?