No. 24-7404
Zoe Ajjahnon v. Edward Sandler
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-theft constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection per-curium-affirmed property-rights
Latest Conference:
2025-12-05
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Fla. 6thDCA application of the State 's Per Curium: Affirmed (PCA) law violates the US Constitution 14th Amendment and perpetuates affirmance of deprivation of property and liberties in denial of the Amendment ' due process of law guarantees and equal protection of law provisions.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Florida 6th DCA's Per Curium: Affirmed (PCA) law violates the US Constitution's 14th Amendment due process and equal protection provisions
Docket Entries
2025-12-08
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/5/2025.
2025-10-30
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-01
Waiver of Edward Sandler of right to respond submitted.
2025-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent Edward Sandler to respond filed.
2025-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 11, 2025)
Attorneys
Edward Sandler
Jessica Christy Conner — Dean, Ringers, Morgan & Lawton, P.A., Respondent
Zoe Ajjahnon
Zoe Ajjahnon — Petitioner