No. 24-7389

Nathan Ray Foreman v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2025-06-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-counsel constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance jury-misconduct
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

The investigation and presentation of a motion for new trial after a jury convicts a Defendant is a critical stage of the appellate process. The question herein presented is whether the failure of initial appellate counsel was deficient to require an out of time appeal or hearing on a motion for new trial based on initial appellate counsel's failure to investigate jury misconduct arising from a juror's relationship with a co-defendant and his family that would establish the juror's bias and the granting of a new trial.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the failure of initial appellate counsel to investigate jury misconduct arising from a juror's relationship with a co-defendant constitutes ineffective assistance warranting an out-of-time appeal or new trial hearing

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-01-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 10, 2025)

Attorneys

Nathan Foreman
Stanley G. SchneiderSchneider & McKinney, P.C., Petitioner