Given that the documentary evidence in this case appears to indisputably confirm that the said Criminal Arrest Record appears to have been fabricated and corruptly imposed on the Petitioner by the named Defendant Chicago Police Officers, acting in collusion and collaboration with as-yet-unknown U.S. Immigration & Customs and Enforcement Officers;

AND Petitioner's two Arrests were predicated on the contemporaneously prepared CPD Police Incident Report #' HP451203 dated July 14th, 2008 (see APPENDIX D) where the alleged Complainant asserted that her attacker was "a WHITE MALE ", when in fact the Petitioner is a "BLACK AFRICAN MALE" : a fact that prompted District Judge John Z. Lee (as was then known) to state in his Opinion dated 09/09/2022 •' "How Mr. Adebowale became a suspect is the crux of this case ", AND President Trump 's Administration 's avowed policy of Mass Deportation of Immigrants with Criminal Records, AND that this resulted in the Petitioner now being branded a "Criminal Alien ", without being given any "opportunity at some time to be heard " [on the merits], see A.A.R.P., v. TRUMP, 605 U.S. __(2025), where the Supreme Court squarely held that "Procedural due process rules are meant to protect against 'the mistaken or unjustified deprivation of life, liberty, or property '", AND that, in effect, deportable from the U.S. without "even a gossamer thread of Due Process "{Per Patricia A. Millett, Circuit Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, NYT 3.28.2025 at p.A18). See also Trump v. J.G.G., 604 U.S._, _2025). Against this backdrop and context:

(1) . Was it improper for the Court of Appeals 7th Circuit to have undertaken outlier {even a pariah ) interpretation of the 'Final Order ' (28 U.S.C. s. 1291) provisions, which CONFLICTS with all the other Sister Circuits Courts of Appeal by giving short-shrift to the threshold question of whether there was in fact and in law a 'Final Order ' in this case before leaping onto consideration of the "time limit " to appeal what appears to be a non-existent 'Yin2l Order ', in order to achieve the improper objective of depriving the Petitioner his constitutionally guaranteed Due Process rights ?; and

(2) . Was it improper for the Court of Appeals to refuse or even consider the Petitioner 's requested Mandamus Order (finding that it lacked jurisdiction), given District Judge Joan H. Lefkow 's repeated willful defiance and misrepresentation of the law-Rule 60(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure-even after had explicitly acknowledged in his Order dated 01/11/2024 that the requisite leave of the Court of Appeals was required in this case?

Whether fabricated criminal arrest records created through police misconduct violate a defendant's constitutional rights to due process and fair adjudication