No. 24-7383

In Re Robert Timothy Blake

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2025-06-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process evidence-tampering habeas-corpus ineffective-counsel search-warrant
Latest Conference: 2025-06-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

Were the constitutional rights of Robert Timothy Blake violated when his Trial Attorney failed to notice/ dispute/or Challenge the validity of the Search Warrant in this case ?

Were the defendant's constitutional rights violated/ when his password protected e-mail account was accessed by the FBI without a valid Search Warrant with Probable Cause ?

Was the defendant prejudiced and denied due process/ when the Government's Attorney withheld ; & denied the defendant discovery of specific requested document's and evidence/ that was clearly requested by the defence attorney prior to the Suppression of Evidence hearing/ and the defendant's change of Plea ?

Were this defendant's constitutional rights violated, when the FBI agent's own notes of an interrogation that was not recorded/will be modified and adjusted with false information and evidence/ that will compose the factual basis written into the Plea agreement/ and establish the only knowingly aspects of this case to show a concerning "Scienter ?"
Where the "knowingly conditions are a fabrication that is not supported by the evidence or testimony in the record.

Did the FBI provide knowingly false statements and knowingly unreliable evidence/ in reckless disregard to the validity of the information to# obtain a search warrant for this defendant's home ?

Did the defendant's attorney provide constitutionally competent assistance of counsel by not seeking or understanding the e-mail evidence in this case/ prior to advising the defendant to Plea Guilty/ Or before attempting to defend the defendant of the e-mail evidence and distribution charges at sentencing ?

Did the government's attorney interfere with the fair administration of justice at a constitutional level/ by presenting/ and purpousfully allowing the Sentencing Court to depend upon false and altered information and evidence that the Attorney will know to be false and unreliable/ and not known to the defendant at any previous time ?

Did the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals properly deny this defendant's second-in-time- application for habeas relief/ in an effort to raise claims for relief/ that were not known/ at any previous time before he, will file his initial habeas petition in ..the District Court ?
Was this petitioner denied a full and fair oppertunity to/ present previous claims denied as "Premature" ?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the defendant's constitutional rights were violated by ineffective assistance of counsel, improper search warrants, withheld discovery, and potentially false FBI evidence during criminal proceedings

Docket Entries

2025-09-05
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-08-14
DISTRIBUTED.
2025-07-20
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-06-30
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2025-06-02

Attorneys

Robert Blake
Robert Timothy Blake — Petitioner