No. 24-7377
Jay J. Lin v. Hudson City Savings Bank, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction constitutional-review district-court judicial-procedure legal-error supremacy-clause
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit should review the case that it was the party to the violation of the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.
2. The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit should review the case that it had ordered and completed the briefing of the case re the violation and circumvented the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States with the wrong case and wrong laws by the District Court.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Third Circuit erred in failing to review a potential violation of the Supremacy Clause by the District Court of New Jersey
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-02
Waiver of right of respondent Hudson City Savings Bank, et al. to respond filed.
2025-04-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 7, 2025)
Attorneys
Hudson City Savings Bank, et al.
James P. Berg — Parker Ibrahim & Berg LLP, Respondent
Jay J. Lin
Jay J. Lin — Petitioner