1. Whether the Fifth Amendment's double jeopardy clause as interpreted by Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1, 18 (1978) protects an individual from a subsequent prosecution where the prosecutor produced insufficient evidence at trial to support a conviction by failing to rebut the presumption already established by Bruen at the time of trial of a right to carry a firearm outside the home in self-defense;

2. Whether a state court must immediately implement this Court's interpretation of the Second Amendment and not delay its full application until such time as it has had the opportunity to rule on how that holding impacts state evidentiary law pursuant to U.S. Const. Art. VI; and

3. Whether an evidentiary statute that places the burden on a defendant to produce evidence that he is engaged in constitutionally protected conduct offends notions of Due Process and cannot justify the prosecution's failure to prove an element of a criminal offense in accordance with In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970).

Whether the Fifth Amendment's double jeopardy clause protects an individual from subsequent prosecution when insufficient evidence was produced to rebut the presumption of a right to carry a firearm established in Bruen