No. 24-7370
Jonathan Davis v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure implied-bias juror-disqualification jury-impartiality sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-11-21
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Does the Constitution require selected jurors to be free from implied bias?
II. What standards should apply when assessing an implied bias claim?
III. Did the Eighth Circuit err in concluding that a juror was not impliedly biased when he had been the victim of a crime nearly identical to the crime alleged at trial?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Constitution require selected jurors to be free from implied bias and what standards should apply when assessing an implied bias claim?
Docket Entries
2025-11-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/21/2025.
2025-10-29
Reply of Jonathan Davis submitted.
2025-10-29
Reply of petitioner Jonathan Davis filed.
2025-10-22
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2025-09-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 22, 2025.
2025-09-15
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-09-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 22, 2025 to October 22, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-08-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 22, 2025.
2025-08-21
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-08-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 22, 2025 to September 22, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-07-23
Response Requested. (Due August 22, 2025)
2025-06-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-06-13
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-06-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-06-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 7, 2025)
Attorneys
Jonathan Davis
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Moez Mansoor Kaba — Hueston Hennigan LLP, Respondent