Sheterria Lanelle Jackson v. Florida
DueProcess
I. DID THE TRIAL COURT ERR WHEN IT DENIED PETITIONER'S CLAIM THAT COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO CHALLENGE EVIDENCE PRESENTED AND FOR FAILING TO FILE A MOTION TO SUPPRESS, IN TURN VIOLATING HER SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL AND HER FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW?
II. WAS THE PETITIONER'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL UNDER THE SIXTH AMENDMENT AND DUE PROCESS RIGHT UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT VIOLATED WHEN THE TRIAL COURT DENIED PETITIONER'S CLAIM THAT COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO ISSUE FOR A PRE-TRIAL MOTION TO DISMISS?
Did the trial court err when it denied petitioner's claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge evidence and for failing to file a motion to suppress, violating her Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel and her Fourteenth Amendment right to due process of law?