No. 24-7344

Sheterria Lanelle Jackson v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2025-06-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process ineffective-assistance motion-to-suppress sixth-amendment trial-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

I. DID THE TRIAL COURT ERR WHEN IT DENIED PETITIONER'S CLAIM THAT COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO CHALLENGE EVIDENCE PRESENTED AND FOR FAILING TO FILE A MOTION TO SUPPRESS, IN TURN VIOLATING HER SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL AND HER FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW?

II. WAS THE PETITIONER'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL UNDER THE SIXTH AMENDMENT AND DUE PROCESS RIGHT UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT VIOLATED WHEN THE TRIAL COURT DENIED PETITIONER'S CLAIM THAT COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO ISSUE FOR A PRE-TRIAL MOTION TO DISMISS?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the trial court err when it denied petitioner's claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge evidence and for failing to file a motion to suppress, violating her Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel and her Fourteenth Amendment right to due process of law?

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent State of Florida to respond filed.
2025-04-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 3, 2025)

Attorneys

Sheterria L. Jackson
Sheterria L. Jackson — Petitioner
State of Florida
Trisha Meggs PateOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent