Counsel ///( <S\S5'/J'/c«ce boher?
4o cW|<nje oP JunK Sew UM &>rnis Ae [>n'™y
^Vi'dtnce. of ^vil-k H-ere, Counsel Q<u(ed +o ck<x//<?^e -fhe. ■deSp/rnaty oP
Lx /,/€xper4' v Coho ofV-e^J 4hx —Ophion 4-WU- pled^cv - ujas (\enr/^ Sc&nc.
Of Vv»€ G c I'm. «4- 4-ke Vm <4- COzcJ Carnftidhtc/., CtS cu necu Jrt'al
Cukene -Llu S G/dovc-e coa.s G<AiCce\ 4-o 4-ke, J<jny Ks VerAtcf?

TC^ Tn^ Counsel Genies 5 ttoeWechve GSs^V^nco t*Aen 4-Wy £c<( ( 4-o
., r'etuV 1rcu\ CY-PerV uj^us cooulcL Vvw/e G£-U-W iSVied d-'^d- 4-W.
<__.Cv I ( 0^
p'€x"V^ OpiYQton 'fVccCc-^c/^ Z/'Cr'e z CoctnS^.1

Call 6c CSL^C. rebut- 4-ke ^apihia^ -Pked
zPUd<?r' Loas 4-ivG Sc^ne. of 4-VvG Cn m-e. a,4- i^e 4-trwc s'4- comb
TS A. f)CU> 4~<"taJ Gc^uire.4 bo^Cxc Co^np^C-exaV <p«,H =o<<>'^vvcC likely CuavlJ
tft ovn <xc^vi44a,\ 7

J1L- Tr»cJ Counsel Mendes'S Tn& 'Pfiec'/-/^e G-SS/S^nce. 4-he.y P-ecrt -/q
obJecA- -Vo Vye_<xrg^ -ev/iAence bobvicVi ccKouOS 4-ke Ccynmona;*?"-/'^ "fo defea./ a
fYla-l-ion £>r retjuir-ed CowiSe/ 'fi^r/ec/ rPj o^Jec/ 4-a Kcaf-sn^
uohtch £r^ed oniy ei/J^ce Connech^j Mr, ■&> fhone ^<-J<jener<x-Led -Vk-a. ^tS^oV&l CSLT -evidenCA- Xs a. Q-eW A-<\c4 ceejuireJ

Whether counsel's failure to challenge the admissibility of expert testimony and hearsay evidence prejudicially impacted the defendant's right to a fair trial