No. 24-7327
Artur Gilowski v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: None
Latest Conference:
2025-06-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Weather defense Counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failure to request special jury instructions that would allow the jury to make a determination whether a conspiracy existed, or it was just a common buyer seller relationship for the criminal acts charged in the indictment.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified.
Docket Entries
2025-06-30
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2025-06-05
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-06-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-04-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 30, 2025)
Attorneys
Artur Gilowski
Artur Gilowski — Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent