1. IS IT REVERSIBLE ERROR FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS TO TREAT OPPOSING PARTIES (ONE A BLACK MALE ATTORNEY AND THE OTHER A WHITE MALE ATTORNEY ) DIFFERENTLY IN REACHING ITS DECISION IN THE CASE?

2. ARE FALSE STATEMENTS MADE BY A FEDERAL DISTRICT JUDGE TREATED THE SAME AS FALSE STATEMENTS MADE BY LITIGANTS DURING THE COURSE OF LITIGATION?

3. IS THE CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENT TO BRING A 42 U.S.C. sec. 1981 CLAIM, AS ESPOUSED IN DOMINO'S PIZZA, STILL GOOD LAW FOR NON-CONTRACT sec. 1981 CLAIMS?

4. CAN A CASE LEGALLY BE DEEMED FRIVOLOUS WHERE THERE IS A PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY REVERSAL TO BE DECIDED ?

Is it reversible error for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to treat opposing parties differently based on race, and are false statements by a federal district judge treated the same as litigants' false statements?