No. 24-7314
Missouri, ex rel. Jeffrey Weinhaus v. Richard Adams, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Latest Conference:
2025-06-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Where State law entitles a prisoner to habeas corpus review of a Constitutional claim upon a showing of cause and prejudice, does the summary denial of a facially valid petition violate due process of law?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Where State law entitles a prisoner to habeas corpus review of a Constitutional claim upon a showing of cause and prejudice, does the summary denial of a facially valid petition violate due process of law?
Docket Entries
2025-06-30
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2025-06-09
Waiver of right of respondent Richard Adams to respond filed.
2025-05-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 30, 2025)
2025-03-19
Application (24A899) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until May 1, 2025.
2025-03-07
Application (24A899) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 23, 2025 to May 1, 2025, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Jeffrey Weinhaus
Sean D. O'Brien — Petitioner
Richard Adams
Joshua Michael Divine — Office of the Missouri Attorney General, Respondent