The questions presented for review include whether state sovereign immunity can be and
should be applied to unofficial acts and federal laws of copyright infringement and fraud. This is
a question of law, de novo, because when the Constitution of the United States or laws of the
United States directly contradict a law or statute of the State of Virginia, a decision must be made
to make clear boundaries of what details of the civil proceedings will agree with the Constitution
of the United States and laws or statutes of the State of Virginia. Specifically, in this proceeding
the law or statute of the State of Virginia is sovereign immunity. On the other hand, the
Constitution of the United States has copyright protection laws, federal fraud laws, and
denounces itself as the Supreme Law of the Land. Also, federal copyright infringement laws
contradict state sovereign immunity laws as well because you cannot simply enforce both at the
same time unless new laws are created.

Whether state sovereign immunity applies to federal copyright infringement and fraud claims under the Constitution