No. 24-7292
Germaine Ramsey v. United States
Tags: appellate-review certiorari grant-vacate-remand judicial-discretion supreme-court-procedure thompson-case
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Court should GVR in light of Thompson v. United States, 604 U.S. ___, 145 S. Ct. 821 (2025).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court should grant, vacate, and remand (GVR) in light of Thompson v. United States
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-08-07
Reply of Germaine Ramsey submitted.
2025-08-07
Reply of petitioner Germaine Ramsey filed.
2025-07-25
memorandum for the united states in opposition of United States submitted.
2025-07-25
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2025-06-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 28, 2025.
2025-06-18
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-06-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 26, 2025 to July 28, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-05-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 26, 2025)
Attorneys
Germaine Ramsey
Matthew B. Larsen — Federal Defenders of New York, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Moez Mansoor Kaba — Hueston Hennigan LLP, Respondent