No. 24-7251
Michael Deuschel v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Latest Conference:
2026-01-09
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Ninth Circuit departed from the Erie Doctrine, and violated
Appellant's due process rights, when it ratified the district court's 12(b)(6) dismissal
without leave to amend, disregarding California's required delayed discovery rule
analysis in its ruling?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit departed from the Erie Doctrine and violated Appellant's due process rights when it ratified the district court's 12(b)(6) dismissal without leave to amend, disregarding California's required delayed discovery rule analysis
Docket Entries
2026-01-12
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-12-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-10-31
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-05-29
Waiver of Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Corporation, and Bayer HealthCare LLC of right to respond submitted.
2025-05-29
Waiver of McKesson Corporation; McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc. of right to respond submitted.
2025-05-29
Waiver of right of respondents Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Corporation, and Bayer HealthCare LLC to respond filed.
2025-05-29
Waiver of right of respondents McKesson Corporation; McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc. to respond filed.
2025-03-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 20, 2025)
Attorneys
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Corporation, and Bayer HealthCare LLC
McKesson Corporation; McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc.
Habib Nasrullah — Wheeler Trigg O'Donnell LLP, Respondent
Michael Deuschel
Michael Deuschel — Petitioner