No. 24-7234
IFP
Tags: district-court-jurisdiction federal-prisoners habeas-corpus post-conviction-relief second-successive-claims statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2025-06-05
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the bar in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1) applies to claims presented by federal prisoners in a second or successive motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
Whether fraud and deceit per Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 60(b)(3), and 60(b)(6) are subject to the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the bar in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1) applies to claims presented by federal prisoners in a second or successive motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Docket Entries
2025-06-06
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2025-05-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/5/2025.
2025-05-03
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
Diehl, In Re David
David A. Diehl — Petitioner