No. 24-7225
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-exhaustion administrative-remedies habeas-corpus judicial-conflict prison-reform section-2254
Latest Conference:
2025-06-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. WHETHER the limited number of cases at courthouses is fully preserved by litigants and issues encompassing situations of cases involving imminent interference with motion.
2. WHETHER the principle of cardinal estoppel is relevant to the person hearing performance of examination pursuant to inmates under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 to exhaust all reasonable administrative remedies.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the principle of administrative exhaustion applies to prison habeas petitions under 28 U.S.C. section 2254 to exhaust administrative remedies
Docket Entries
2025-06-16
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/12/2025.
2025-05-21
Waiver of right of respondent Anthony Wills to respond filed.
2025-05-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 16, 2025)
2025-04-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 16, 2025)
2025-02-05
Application (24A761) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until May 17, 2025.
2025-01-29
Application (24A761) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 18, 2025 to May 17, 2025, submitted to Justice Barrett.
Attorneys
Anthony Wills
Chad Cutler
Chad Cutler — Petitioner
Harry L. Goldsboro
Harry Lee Goldsboro — Petitioner