No. 24-7212
Dequarn Markeyth Bell v. Lisa Stenseth, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2253 certificate-of-appealability federal-court habeas-corpus reasonable-jurists statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2025-06-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. In deciding whether to issue a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, may a federal court find that "reasonable jurists would not disagree" with the denial of relief where other courts have resolved the issue, on similar facts, in a manner favorable to habeas petitioner's position?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a federal court may find that 'reasonable jurists would not disagree' with the denial of habeas relief when other courts have resolved similar issues favorably to the petitioner
Docket Entries
2025-06-16
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/12/2025.
2025-05-22
Waiver of right of respondent Lisa Steneth, Warden to respond filed.
2025-05-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 16, 2025)
Attorneys
Dequarn Bell
Zachary Allen Longsdorf — Longsdorf Law Firm, PLC, Petitioner
Lisa Steneth, Warden
Adam Edward Petras — Hennepin County Attorney's Office, Respondent