QUESTION ONE:
Did the Eleventh Court of Appeals, at Eastland, Texas, deny Petitioner's Due Process to an appeal in the normal course by ordering Petitioner to file a pro se response pursuant to Ander's, when his appeal was not an Ander's proceeding?

QUESTION TWO:
Did retained Appellate Counsel render ineffective assistance by filing an Ander's Brief misguiding Petitioner to file a pro se response pursuant to Ander's and not a brief in the normal course of an appeal, or hire new counsel. Denying effective assistance, due process, and forfeiture of an entitled proceeding?

QUESTION THREE:
Did trial Counsel render ineffective assistance for failing to investigate, interview, depose, and prepare defense first witness, Ariana Hernandez, which elicited extraneous offense testimony, denying a fundamentally fair trial and punishment?

QUESTION FOUR:
Did trial Counsel render ineffective assistance by failing to object that the admission of the audio recording was forcing Petitioner to choose one constitutional right over another, violating his constitutional rights to a fundamentally fair trial and punishment?

Did the Eleventh Court of Appeals deny Petitioner's due process by ordering a pro se response under Anders when the appeal was not an Anders proceeding?