After "Howes v. Fields," are Courts to treat interrogation of an incarcerated person as fundamentally equivalent to (or less serious) than interrogation in other, non-incarcerated settings?

If so does "Fields" create a conflict with cases like "Illinois v. Perkins," 496 US 292 (1990) warranting revisiting or reversing it?

Does the rule of "Missouri v. Seibert," 542 US 600 (2004) apply to any attempt of officers to deliberately avoid complying with "Miranda," or just the two step procedure in that case? Should Courts weigh such deliberate avoidance in "Miranda" cases?

Whether courts should treat interrogation of an incarcerated person as fundamentally equivalent to interrogation in non-incarcerated settings and whether Howes v. Fields creates a conflict with prior Supreme Court precedent