No. 24-716
Tate David Prows v. City of Oxford, Ohio, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: article-iii-standing chilling-effect constitutional-rights first-amendment legislative-authority police-power
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-02-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Are all First Amendment Chilling Effect Cases Subjective?
2. Do Political Subdivisions of States Have the Lawful Authority to Create Their Own Police Powers?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Are all First Amendment Chilling Effect Cases Subjective and Do Political Subdivisions of States Have the Lawful Authority to Create Their Own Police Powers?
Docket Entries
2025-03-03
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2025.
2025-02-04
Waiver of City of Oxford, et al. of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-04
Waiver of right of respondent City of Oxford, et al. to respond filed.
2024-12-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 7, 2025)
Attorneys
City of Oxford, et al.
Jane Michele Lynch — Green & Green, Lawyers, Respondent
Tate D. Prows
Tate David Prows — Petitioner