No. 24-7144
Lamar Haymes v. Jack Stollsteimer, District Attorney of Delaware County, Pennsylvania
IFP
Tags: cause-requirement habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance martinez-rule post-conviction-relief procedural-default
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Does the narrow, equitable authorities announced by this Court in Marchietti v. Rye Silos S.E. prints to establish "cause" for purposes of executing emcedum draft?
2. Under the ATOPANS A Stoke prisoner ethel be one Fue opportunity to Seek Caden Vdecas och veh Grem\nis comics, Also shale Court decisions conteanyte cl<adny realdoidhed lace can ~eniible Ane pele Se eek T
3. Was tre edatioree Sfecad from & Poorkeedthy Amedmet Sue Crecess vielakion
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the narrow 'cause' requirement announced by this Court in Martinez v. Ryan preclude prisoners from establishing 'cause' for purposes of excusing procedural default?
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-02-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 6, 2025)
Attorneys
Lamar Haymes
Lamar Haymes — Petitioner