No. 24-7137

In Re Jack Eugene Carpenter, III

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2025-05-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: counsel-consultation district-court-authority evidence-preservation jurisdiction legal-representation self-determination
Latest Conference: 2025-05-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

Does a sid WW Os Sb USES NEA, Creade "discedion "yo ovad tne Distinct
gucts uky ro ensuce yucisdickion exists?

Pre celicious oelwfs oc \oelie€s Cores Aue. ko celigious Qrackices evidence. Yaak O Oecsor)
\acks an aloi\iey te Unckerstund Me. groceedings agarosly Yen oc lacks 'ne oloility
fo _Cansullk width comnse 9

\¢ n DVS nas the, Ccdote Xo \ne\d Gay OPiara0 Cres Coon gn ORLA CE & ex
AN ON OOinV0 Yee, used ko c\ Gunn Ov Reson \ackts talteNon Nay wackerhund e
OGeee ings Gagrask Anim oc \acks, Wre clodiie ko consuls Cotta counsel?

QAO PRON 'De Go wack 'eo \or\ Ye aldliby Xo Cansudk watt) ex eA GS ' ot
An Mee de&e 2 Ween Connseh st_lhas She oloility ko sult
With Counsel Yo aserst in Weie Aebense?

Me. \oelieSe, fan \oelhaviiar OSs acaued. 'Oy ne A pravdted Cock?

\E AS USC GAN allows Foc a dean of 30 Moo \Sd, ion, hen \20_|
AOA re ssocekion ox Wreck Mant does 1k WE CavYVe, Ov Quarsinmes' CXOSLAN N
Qocess,, wwhok Nadkacs ace. congadvecedh?

Con a Dietrick Couck Sagpose a dePenckont posed. oa Wreretimon Cy O

\s Ane Dabrick Couck Wne acdttor of Whekher of 1s Ookion \nas exercised
Pre Crank of sll determination and self-dlech o eat?

Does eskecrikoriol z aw §& a nakion ot its ext Q
oc once it achteues ctubelwood or push thet shake hod toe Ceconnized? Does _|
the ria +o \ndependence aad dignity of O nodion ouch 0 birth oka
nohon , When Nine nation \pecomes a Ghedre, 'oy AcoUscine yeterucy oc When _
o Kocdon Ootion "Cecoag ire so Aodions Odin to -vechkory?

en Yhe Sake \Depactenent ig "formed ot Ye clawed Soocders of a de
ko Shute. ad Oeaotakes ao orocéas Yor Ws Cibizens ALGure NEA- |
Niatate can nsas Yo cake ne Uadked Shekes with Xie Gees Sovertis Pav
Aekermining Now

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a District Court can exercise jurisdiction and self-determination when a defendant lacks the ability to consult with counsel and preserve evidence

Docket Entries

2025-06-02
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/29/2025.
2025-05-08
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-05-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-01-31
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 4, 2025)

Attorneys

Carpenter, In Re Jack E.
Jack Eugene Carpenter III — Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent