No. 24-7123
Carlos Edward Thurman, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure district-court equal-protection firearm-enhancement second-amendment sentencing-guidelines
Latest Conference:
2025-05-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Whether the district court clearly erred by applying the USSG § 2D1.1(b)(1) firearm enhancement?
II. Whether general application of the USSG § 2D1.1(b)(1) firearm enhancement and BOP policy violate equal protection and Second Amendment principles?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court's application of the USSG § 2D1.1(b)(1) firearm enhancement was clearly erroneous and whether such enhancement violates equal protection and Second Amendment principles
Docket Entries
2025-06-02
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/29/2025.
2025-05-08
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-05-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-04-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 2, 2025)
Attorneys
Carlos Thurman
Jarrod James Beck — Law Office of Jarrod J. Beck, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent