No. 24-710
Daniel D. Basile, III v. Illinois
Response Waived
Tags: confession-evidence constitutional-amendments due-process grand-jury judicial-review prosecutorial-misconduct
Latest Conference:
2025-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Illinois Supreme Court's holding
in this case weakens the shield function of the grand
jury process by inappropriately altering the standard
for establishing a substantial denial of due process
set forth in United States v. Mechanik and Bank of
Nova Scotia v. United States.
Whether the appropriate remedy for
substantial denials of due process in grand jury
proceedings is dismissal of the Indictment with
prejudice as a deterrent to prosecutorial misconduct.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Illinois Supreme Court's holding weakens the shield function of the grand jury process by inappropriately altering the standard for establishing a substantial denial of due process
Docket Entries
2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-30
Waiver of Illinois of right to respond submitted.
2025-01-30
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2024-12-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 3, 2025)
Attorneys
Daniel Basile III
Mark Anthony Byrd — Mark A. Byrd, P.C., Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Illinois