No. 24-7092
Michael Dwayne Tryals v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: claims-processing direct-appeal equitable-tolling federal-rule-criminal-procedure mandatory-rules trial-court-violation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy
HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2025-05-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Whether a trial court's violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(j)(1) is subject to redress on direct appeal?
II. Whether an untimely criminal appeal occasioned by a trial court's violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(j)(1) is subject to equitable tolling?
III. Whether a trial court's violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(j)(1) constitutes unique circumstances under the Court's case law to warrant an exception to a mandatory claims processing rule?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a trial court's violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(j)(1) can be remedied on direct appeal, through equitable tolling, or as an exception to mandatory claims processing rules
Docket Entries
2025-06-02
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/29/2025.
2025-05-07
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-05-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-04-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 29, 2025)
Attorneys
Michael Tryals
Marisa Conroy — Law Office of Marisa L. D. Conroy, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent