No. 24-7068
Lee Ray Boykin, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: None
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-05-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Did the District Court err by violating Mr. Boykin's fundamental right to a fair trial under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution by failing to have Mr. Boykin evaluated by a qualified mental health professional for the purposes of competency determination?
2. Did the District Court err by finding that Mr. Boykin was competent to stand trial in the absence of a report by a credentialed mental health professional?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified.
Docket Entries
2025-06-02
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/29/2025.
2025-05-08
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-05-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-04-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 23, 2025)
Attorneys
Lee Ray Boykin, Jr.
Amy Ruth Blalock — Blalock Law Firm, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent