No. 24-706
Andrew Thomas Cowhy v. Michigan
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure judicial-precedent jury-trial sentencing sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2025-03-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
Should the Court reexamine its holding in Oregon v. Ice, 555 U.S. 160 (2009), which exempts factual findings necessary to increase a defendant's punishment through the imposition of consecutive sentences from the Sixth Amendment jury requirement?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court should reexamine its holding in Oregon v. Ice regarding the Sixth Amendment jury requirement for consecutive sentencing
Docket Entries
2025-03-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2024-12-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 3, 2025)
2024-10-22
Application (24A387) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until December 30, 2024.
2024-10-18
Application (24A387) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 31, 2024 to December 30, 2024, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Andrew Cowhy
James Gerometta — Law Office of James Gerometta, Petitioner