Dismissal of a juror based on a purported unwillingness or inability to follow the law is impermissible when the impetus for the dismissal stems from the juror's views on the merits of the case. Is the standard for dismissal a "demonstrable reality" the juror's views on the merits are the impetus, "any possibility" the juror's views on the merits are the impetus, only "any reasonable possibility" the juror's views on the merits are the impetus, or only "any substantial possibility" the juror's views on the merits are the impetus?

Whether the standard for dismissing a juror based on views on the merits of the case is a 'demonstrable reality', 'any possibility', 'any reasonable possibility', or 'any substantial possibility'