No. 24-7049
Michael Fimbres v. O'Brian Bailey, Acting Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-review federal-review habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance state-court-decision statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2025-05-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Ninth Circuit step outside the bounds of § 2254(d) by considering reasons not found in the CCA's reasoned opinion to determine the reasonableness of that opinion?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit step outside the bounds of § 2254(d) by considering reasons not found in the CCA's reasoned opinion to determine the reasonableness of that opinion?
Docket Entries
2025-05-27
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/22/2025.
2025-04-29
Waiver of O'Brian Bailey of right to respond submitted.
2025-04-29
Waiver of right of respondent O'Brian Bailey to respond filed.
2025-04-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 22, 2025)
2025-02-11
Application (24A776) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until April 21, 2025.
2025-02-07
Application (24A776) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 20, 2025 to April 21, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Michael Fimbres
Pablo Almazan — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
O'Brian Bailey
Kenneth Charles Byrne — California Attorney General, Respondent