1. Does Jones v Hendrix , 599 U.S. 465 (2023), a recent Supreme
Court holding which only addresses "[] a prisoner asserting an
intervening change in interpretation of a criminal statute to
circumvent the [AEDPA]" by filing a § 2241, overturn Bousley v
United States , 523 U.S. 614 (1998), a case addressing a claim
of "actual innocence" in a § 2241, where the Supreme Court
found it appropriate to remand back to the District Court,
permitting him to "make a showing of actual innocence"?

2. Does the holding in Jones v Hendrix , 599 U.S. 465 (2023) render
.§ 2241(c)(3) invalid?

3. Was the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals wrong by not recognizing
a claim of "actual innocence", a claim separate and distinct
from a claim of "legal innocence", as an exception under
Bousley v United States?

Does Jones v Hendrix overturn Bousley v United States regarding actual innocence claims and § 2241 procedures?