1. Whether Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act provides
continued immunity to internet platforms that knowingly host user
generated content involving impersonation, harassment, child
exploitation, and death threats after repeated notifications, law
enforcement referrals, and ignored court orders —especially where such
conduct implicates federal criminal statutes and exposes the legal void in
regulating online harm.

2. Whether the Massachusetts Appeals Court erred in upholding dismissal
without considering claims that platforms supported criminal activity,
and whether the Supreme Judicial Court violated due process by denying
further appellate review, thereby barring civil remedies based on an
overbroad interpretation of Section 230, contrary to Congressional intent
to permit recovery for criminal harms.

Whether Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act provides continued immunity to internet platforms that knowingly host user generated content involving impersonation, harassment, child exploitation, and death threats after repeated notifications, law enforcement referrals, and ignored court orders