No. 24-698
Rose Ann Kimble-Davis v. Office of Personnel Management
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: administrative-law administrative-review beneficiary-designation due-process evidence-standard opm-procedure
Latest Conference:
2025-04-25
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether an agency/court can determine an individual is not a designated beneficiary without providing the claimed beneficiary with the appropriate documentation?
2. Whether OPM should have determined an individual was the designated beneficiary where evidence was submitted which illustrated the individual was designated as a beneficiary?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an agency or court can determine an individual is not a designated beneficiary without providing the claimed beneficiary with the appropriate documentation?
Docket Entries
2025-04-28
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-04-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/25/2025.
2025-03-20
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-16
Waiver of right of respondent OPM to respond filed.
2024-08-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 30, 2025)
Attorneys
OPM
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Rose A. Kimble-Davis
Rose Ann Kimble-Davis — Petitioner