Whether the Supremacy Clause justifies a stay once the trial court had been protected harp actice that the Competent federal CoA purel had exercised preteal jorisdicton,

Whether the state traf court's colloquy on April Ze, ZolZ, resulting ta a0 atay, demonstrates & sham ptosecution fo circumvent the CoA's quatan teed foderal clou ble jooparcly 3 224 pretrial appeal yesu ting in @ Conflict ,

Whether 4 state court of last pesett maintains 4 certorar Constdutional duty fo intervene P maaitest iagustoe has occurred, by usurpe trod of Adel appellate authority '

Whether the Supremacy Clause justifies a stay once the trial court had been provected and whether a state court of last resort maintains a constitutional duty to intervene in manifest injustice