When a state court refuses to conduct an evidentiary hearing, at which a petitioner would have an opportunity to test and rebut testimonial and other evidence relied upon by the State to defeat his colorable claims, will its factual findings be entitled to deference under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2)?

2. In bringing a challenge under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2), is a petitioner required to first satisfy 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(1)'s requirement to rebut the presumption of correctness of a state court's factual findings by clear and convincing evidence?

When a state court refuses to conduct an evidentiary hearing, will its factual findings be entitled to deference under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2), and must a petitioner first satisfy 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(1)'s requirement to rebut the presumption of correctness by clear and convincing evidence?