No. 24-6915

George Valentino Sloan v. Washington

Lower Court: Washington
Docketed: 2025-04-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights continuance due-process judicial-discretion speedy-trial trial-court
Latest Conference: 2025-05-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Did the trial court violate the Petitioner's Constitutional right to a speedy trial when the trial court kept granting stated continuance motions over a period of ten months before the Petitioner was brought to trial?

2. Did the Trial Court Constrain the Petitioner into a Hobson's choice on when the trial court denied the Petitioner's motion order for Depositions Defendant?

3. Did the Trial Court Abuse its discretion in granting Continuances beyond CrimR 3.3 time limits and bail?

4. Did the trial court err in requesting Defendants Fingerprints?

5. Did the trial court err in denying Petitioner's CrR 3.3 motions, even after the State revealed Suppressed evidence during closing arguments?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Trial Court violate the Petitioner's Constitutional right to a speedy trial by denying continuance motions over ten months before trial?

Docket Entries

2025-06-02
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/29/2025.
2024-10-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 2, 2025)

Attorneys

George Valentino Sloan
George Valentino Sloan — Petitioner