No. 24-6914
Joanthony Johnson v. Michael Shewmaker, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability federal-review habeas-corpus procedural-default state-court-procedure statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy
HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2025-05-02
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a reasonable jurist could debate whether 28 U.S.C. §2254(d) is applicable to a case in which the state court rejected the petitioner's claim on a procedural ground rather than resolving the merits of the claim.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a reasonable jurist could debate the applicability of 28 U.S.C. §2254(d) when a state court rejects a claim on procedural grounds
Docket Entries
2025-07-21
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-06-26
DISTRIBUTED.
2025-05-30
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-05-05
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/2/2025.
2025-04-16
Waiver of Michael Shewmaker, Warden of right to respond submitted.
2025-04-16
Waiver of right of respondent Michael Shewmaker, Warden to respond filed.
2025-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 1, 2025)
Attorneys
Joanthony Johnson
Joanthony Deaundre Johnson — Petitioner
Michael Shewmaker, Warden
Joshua Michael Divine — Office of the Missouri Attorney General, Respondent