No. 24-6907

Oscar Omar Lobo-Lopez v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-04-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: compassionate-release criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2025-05-02
Question Presented (from Petition)

THE SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO COUNSEL EXTENT TO ALL
CRITICAL STASHES OF A CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS LIKE
COMPASSIONATE RELEASE, WHEN COUNSEL FAILED TO
PROPERLY ARGUE FOR THE EXTRAORDINARY AND COMPELLING
REASONS AND FAILED TO REPLY TO THE GOVERNMENT'S
OPPOSSITION AND FAILS TO INVESTIGATES BOTH FACTUAL
AND LEGAL?

a) The Fourth Circuit Fails When Do Not Addressed These Points in
AND His Pro Se Brief?

Was Lobo denied Effective Assistance of Trial Counsel as Guaranteed
by Sixth Amendment, United States Constitution, When Counsel
Fails to Reply to the Government's Opposition and Fails to Investigate
Both and Factual and Legal?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Sixth Amendment right to counsel extends to critical stages of criminal proceedings such as compassionate release when counsel fails to properly argue extraordinary and compelling reasons

Docket Entries

2025-05-05
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/2/2025.
2025-04-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-01-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 2, 2025)

Attorneys

Oscar O. Lobo-Lopez
Oscar Omar Lobo-Lopez — Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent