No. 24-6900

Robert E. Hammersley v. Wisconsin

Lower Court: Wisconsin
Docketed: 2025-03-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure court-of-appeals judicial-process legal-documentation procedural-requirement record-submission
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-05-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

I. IS REVIEW WARRANTED ON THE QUESTION WHETHER A PARTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS IS REQUIRED TO INDEPENDENTLY SUBMIT DOCUMENTS RELEVANT TO THAT APPEAL AS PART OF THE RECORD WHEN SAID DOCUMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE APPENDIX TO THE PARTY'S BRIEF?

II. IS REVIEW WARRANTED ON THE QUESTION WHETHER PETITIONER'S CLAIMS WERE PROCEDURALLY BARRED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT?

III. IS REVIEW WARRANTED ON THE QUESTION WHETHER CIRCUIT COURT AND/OR WISCONSIN APPELLATE COURTS ARE PREJUDICIALLY BARRING MERITORIOUS PETITIONS TO INVESTIGATE AND/OR OVERTURN SERIOUS MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE CREATING A CAMPAIGN OF HARASSMENT!

IV. IS REVIEW WARRANTED ON THE QUESTION WHETHER CIRCUIT COURT AND/OR WISCONSIN APPELLATE COURTS ARE INCOMPETENTLY AND/OR PREJUDICIALLY NOT HEARING MERITORIOUS PETITIONS TO INVESTIGATE AND OVERTURN SERIOUS MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE THUSLY MAINTAINING A CAMPAIGN OF HARASSMENT!

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is a party in the Court of Appeals required to independently submit documents relevant to that appeal as part of the record when said documents are already included in the record?

Docket Entries

2025-06-02
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/29/2025.
2024-10-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 30, 2025)

Attorneys

Robert E. Hammersley
Robert Hammersley — Petitioner