1. Whether the state Supreme Court's decision, which find a Jandlord-tenant relationship
based on an implied rental agreement without clear evidence of such an agreement, violated
the Petitioners' due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.

2. Whether the Respondent's issuance of an invalid 30-Day notice created procedural
confusion and prejudice, warranting review to ensure proper application of notice
requirements in landlord-tenant disputed.

3. Whether the retention of the Petitioners' appeal bond after reversal of the lower court's
judgment, in the absence of a stay request by the Respondent constitutes procedural inequity
warranting review under federal law.

4. Whether the State Supreme Court erred by prioritizing an alleged implied rental agreement
between the Petitioners and the predecessor over equitable principles, thereby undermining
the Petitioners' long-term possession and significant improvements to the property.

5. Whether the U.S. Supreme Court should clarify the standards for implied rental agreements
and reconcile conflicts between state property laws and equitable doctrines impacting longterm possessors.

Whether the state Supreme Court's decision finding a landlord-tenant relationship based on an implied rental agreement violated the Petitioners' due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment