1.) Was it constitutional violation/error for the U.S. District Court to procedurally default Defendant/Petitioner due to court appointed counsels action/inaction (Trial counsel, Direct Appeal counsel, PCRA counsel), where Defendant/Petitioner raised the issue properly but counsel failed to address, omitted, and or failed to.properly argue the issue?

2.) Did court appointed counsels systematically violate Defendant/Petitioner's constitutional rights by tactically maintaining State charges by causing denial of . the right to a fair trial before an impatial jury, to present, evidence and confront the evidence and witnesses against him, to due process of law, and equal protection of law, where Defendant/Petitioner was affected by Americas continuing neglect to provide adequate representation to indigent persons/defendants?

3.) Did. the Appeals Court error by finding my appeal untimely?

Was it constitutional for a court to procedurally default due to court-appointed counsel's action/inaction where constitutional rights were potentially violated?