GROUND ONE:
WHETHER THE FAILURE TO ADEQUATELY IMPEACH A WITNESS, IN A WHOLLY
CREDIBILITY CASE, CONSTITUTES A VIOLATION OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT 'S
GUARANTEE OF COMPETENT REPRESENTATION OF COUNSEL AND A FAIR AND
IMPARTIAL TRIAL AS MADE OBLIGATORY UPON STATE COURTS BY THE FOUR
TEENTH AMENDMENT.

GROUND TWO:
WHETHER FAILING TO PROPERLY CHALLENGE THE STATE 'S INTRODUCION OF
EVIDENCE OF OTHER CRIMES, WRONGS, OR ACTS CONSTITUTES A VIOLATION
OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENTS GUARANTEE OF COMPETENT REPRESENTATION
OF COUNSEL AND A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL TRIAL AS MADE APPLICABLE BY THE
DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT

GROUND THREE:
WHETHER FAILING TO INVESTIGATE, INTERVIEW, AND/OR CALL WITNESSES TO
TESTIFY AT TRIAL CONSTITUTES A VIOLATION OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENTS
GUARANTEE OF COMPETENT REPRESENTATION OF COUNSEL AND A FAIR AND
IMPARTIAL TRIALAS MADE APPLICABLE BY THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT

GROUND FOUR:
WHETHER FAILING TO REQUEST THE COURT TO ORDER THE ALLEGED VICTIM
TO UNDERGO A MEDICAL EXAMINATION CONSTITUTES A VIOLATION OF THE
SIXTH AMENDMENT'S GUARANTEE OF COMPETENT REPRESENTATION OF
COUNSEL AND A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL TRIAL AS MADE APPLICABLE BY THE DUE
PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT

GROUND FIVE:
WHETHER FAILING TO OBJECT TO THE PROSECUTOR'S IMPROPER COMMENTS
DURING CLOSING ARGUMENT CONSTITUTES A VIOLATION OF THE SIXTH
AMENDMENT'S GUARANTEE OF COMPETENT REPRESENTATION OF COUNSEL
AND A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL TRIAL AS MADE APPLICABLE BY THE DUE PROCESS
CLAUSE OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT

Whether failure to adequately impeach a witness, challenge other crimes evidence, investigate witnesses, request medical examination, and object to prosecutorial misconduct constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel violating the Sixth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment due process rights